メインコンテンツにスキップ

対象のモデルはA1419 / EMC 2806 / Late 2014 または Mid 2015。 3.3 または 3.5GHz Core i5 または 4.0GHz Core i7 (機種ID iMac15,1)、EMC 2834 late 2015 / 3.3 または 3.5 GHz Core i5 または 4.0 GHz Core i7 (機種ID iMac17,1)のRetina 5Kディスプレイを搭載したすべて。

460回答 すべてを表示

How to couple RAM Modules in iMac 27?

Hi, I have just upgraded my iMac by adding 16GB (2x8GB) to the pristine 8GB (2x4GB). Since I know, but I may be wrong, that modules should be coupled, how do I have to do it?

By now I have made a try, putting physically close, in the 4 available trays, similar modules (4GB with 4GB, 8GB with 8GB).

This is the configuration I got from system info (RAM modules coupled in the same bank)

BANK0/DIMM0 8GB

BANK1/DIMM0 4GB

BANK0/DIMM1 8GB

BANK1/DIMM1 4GB

Is this correct, or should I insert them physically alternated, so they I have the same modules coupled in the same DIMM?

Thanks for your help

Francesco

この質問に回答する 同じ問題があります

この質問は役に立ちましたか?

スコア 7

コメント:

my test results with 2019 iMac 8GB and 32GB

configurations (note: the bottom slot is Bank 0 the top slot is Bank 3)

#1: 8GB

Bank 0 Channel A DIMM 0 4GB

Bank 1 Channel A DIMM 1

Bank 2 Channel B DIMM 0 4GB

Bank 3 Channel B DIMM 1

#2: 32GB

Bank 0 Channel A DIMM 0 16GB

Bank 1 Channel A DIMM 1

Bank 2 Channel B DIMM 0 16GB

Bank 3 Channel B DIMM 1

#3: 40GB

Bank 0 Channel A DIMM 0 16GB

Bank 1 Channel A DIMM 1 4GB

Bank 2 Channel B DIMM 0 16GB

Bank 3 Channel B DIMM 1 4GB

#4: 40GB

Bank 0 Channel A DIMM 0 16GB

Bank 1 Channel A DIMM 1 16GB

Bank 2 Channel B DIMM 0 4GB

Bank 3 Channel B DIMM 1 4GB

test results Novabench - each test run three times and since results vary a bit, I am reporting an approximate range (for RAM test only)

#1 24.5K to 26.5K MB/s

#2 27K to 29.5K MB/s

#3 26.5K to 27.5K MB/s

#4 16.8K to 17.2K MB/s

test results Geekbench 5 (single/multi-core)

#1 1218-1220/5510-6856

#2 1310-1326/7850-8220

#3 1187-1197/7760-7880

#4 1187-1192/6250-7750

さんによる

I tested a mix of two kinds of memory sticks with different size capacities and different benchmarks results

A) 2x4G Original Apple SK Hynix

B) 2x16GB Kinsgton HyperX Impact KHX2666C15S4/16G

my analysis:

the Apple Hynix is slower than the Kingston HyperX Impact as can be seen by comparing #1 and #2, where #2 was the fastest of all.

for the mix, #3 where the sticks are staggered was the fastest, but not as fast as #2 (apparently the Apple sticks being slower, bring the overall speed down???)

#4 mix (which if I am not mistaken is what Apple recommends) was the slowest by far in Novabench, 16K vs 26K MB/s, yet about the same as #3 mix in single-core Geekbench and bit faster than #1 in multi-core

see https://discussions.apple.com/thread/251... for what Apple recommended

for a while, I was running #2 with the 32GB Kingston, however, it seems that apps now require more and more memory, and so I just switched to configuration #3 with 40GB

hope this helps

さんによる

コメントを追加

5件の回答

最も参考になった回答

After reading contradictory answers, I decided to make some tests to determine what the correct way to add (2 x 8 GB) RAM to existing (2 x 4 GB) RAM. And this are the results I found.

Tested on iMac (27-inch Mid 2011) Intel Core i7 - 3.4 Ghz with High Sierra:

  • With the following configuration from System Information / Memory (by BANK): ***

BANK 0/DIMM0: 4 GB - DDR3 - 1333 Mhz

BANK 1/DIMM0: 8 GB - DDR3 - 1333 Mhz

BANK 0/DIMM1: 4 GB - DDR3 - 1333 Mhz

BANK 1/DIMM1: 8 GB - DDR3 - 1333 Mhz

Geekbench 4 shows and memory bandwitdh at 8.76 GB/sec for Single-Core and 8.61 GB/sec for Multi-Core

(Full results at : https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/101...)

  • With the following configuration System Information / Memory (by DIMM): ***

BANK 0/DIMM0: 4 GB - DDR3 - 1333 Mhz

BANK 1/DIMM0: 4 GB - DDR3 - 1333 Mhz

BANK 0/DIMM1: 8 GB - DDR3 - 1333 Mhz

BANK 1/DIMM1: 8 GB - DDR3 - 1333 Mhz

Geekbench 4 shows and memory bandwitdh at 15.4 GB/sec for Single-Core and 16.6 GB/sec for Multi-Core

(Full results at : https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/101...)

The good configuration to exploit the Dual Channel to get the best performance is “by DIMM” meaning to have same RAM sizes in same DIMM number.

Daniel

このアンサーは役に立ちましたか?

スコア 22

コメント:

Daniel (MQA) is correct. The identical matching ram should be paired by DIMM number and NOT Bank number. I ran the Geekbench test in both memory configurations, confirming similar findings. Thanks Daniel.

さんによる

This is the correct answer. I did the same testing with my new 2x16GB modules in my iMac 27" (2017)

Here's the memory bandwidth result for Geekbench 4

BANK 0/DIMM0: 16GB

BANK 0/DIMM1: Empty

BANK 1/DIMM0: 16GB

BANK 1/DIMM1: Empty

Single-core: 28.0 GB/sec

Multi-core: 29.9GB/sec

-------------------------------

BANK 0/DIMM0: 16GB

BANK 0/DIMM1: 16GB

BANK 1/DIMM0: Empty

BANK 1/DIMM1: Empty

Single-core: 16.6 GB/sec

Multi-core: 16.0 GB/sec

-------------------------------

With this I can confirm that the RAM modules should be installed pair-wise per DIMM and NOT per BANK on iMac 2017.

さんによる

On the 2019 iMac, the slots are labeled differently:

BANK 0 / Channel A - DIMM 0

BANK 1 / Channel A - DIMM 1

BANK 2 / Channel B - DIMM 0

BANK 3 / Channel B - DIMM 1

Best performance is when BANK 0 matches BANK 2, and BANK 1 matches BANK 3.

さんによる

Don't you just love Apple!

First misusing the word Bank! And now finally using a better word Channel! But still making it confusing!

Populate same sized SO-DIMM's across the different channels.

さんによる

Sure would be nice if Apple themselves provided clear concise info on this, instead of just 'DURR CRAM THEM IN SLOTS'

さんによる

コメントを追加

Is possible that same RAM sizes should be in DIMMs and not in BANKs? Maybe apple just call them differently. Because here is screenshot how looks 12GB from factory in iMac.

Block Image

このアンサーは役に立ちましたか?

スコア 3

コメント:

No, the word Bank is a JEDEC Standards term, and is using it correctly!

Your iMac uses a dual channel architecture to gain the most performance by Interleaving the same sized RAM modules. So when you have two of the SAME modules within a Bank you gain the best performance!

Yes, Mixing your RAM willy nilly will also work!

But, now you are forcing the computer to treat the RAM as a Single Channel AND running at the slowest common RAS & CAS speed of all of the RAM modules you have installed!

さんによる

So I would reseat the modules as I outlined BANK 0 have the same sized modules (x2 2 GB) and BANK 1 the same sized modules (x2 4 GB).

Clearly the person who upgraded your system (it was not Apple) didn't know what they where doing ;-} Apple never shipped a 12 GB system. The dealer you bought your system from added the RAM.

Now one last point! Don't mix different makes or models of DIMM modules that are the same size! You want what we call a Matched Pair Here you can learn more soon that and RAS & CAS Memory DIMM's

さんによる

Dear Dan,

I fully understand what is Dual channel and what advantages it has. What I don't understand why Apple is not using dual channel. For example I just upgraded old 2009 late iMac (RAMs from bottom), and it has 2 RAM modules "horizontally", and 2 slots above (again horizontally) was empty. If you look at any video on youtube, this is original position from factory, which is in OS represented as Bank0/Dimm1 and Bank1/Dimm1 - so different Banks. Thoughts?

https://youtu.be/Z4UqhXIcEQ4?t=2m5s

さんによる

@peterk2 - Take a look here for more details: Guide to RAM Memory Channels as Fast As Possible

Sadly, there is a lot of contradicting information on how the DIMM's need to be installed. So I understand your confusion.

As to the layout of what your 2009 iMac had I don't have one to reference so I can't tell you if the physical layout of the DIMM's (using two 2 GB DIMMS) where or were not installed correctly. The marking of the slot should tell you the layout if a Bank was across or one on top of the other. Its possible the person assembling the iMac messed up.

As I mustily maxed out our iMac or Mac Mini's with the same DIMM's I never needed to worry about it as I was always putting in four matching 4 GB DIMM's.

Why don't you prove to your self what is the best setup. Since you have a 2009 system with only 4 GB run a timed RAM test with the DIMMS across the banks and within the Bank to see which runs faster.

さんによる

I had a problem with my iMac 27 2014.

I have 2 DIMMs 4GB and 2 DIMMs 8GB.

I put (by myself) the modules with the same size on the same banks.

After having this issues (my iMac freezed every once in a while) I send my iMac to Apple Store and after several days they found the memory was not in the correct position and they changed it so that the same size are on the same DIMM.

I never had a problem since then

さんによる

コメントを追加

Sorry, I may be wrong, but I was told to use the same amount of RAM/memory in each channel/bank, 12 in each. the pristine configuration (4GB Slot 1 and 4GB Slot 3 - iMac Late 2015) would validate this (regarding to dual channel).

BANK 0/DIMM0:

Größe: 4 GB

Typ: DDR3

Geschwindigkeit: 1867 MHz

Status: OK

BANK 0/DIMM1:

Größe: 8 GB

Typ: DDR3

Geschwindigkeit: 1867 MHz

Status: OK

BANK 1/DIMM0:

Größe: 4 GB

Typ: DDR3

Geschwindigkeit: 1867 MHz

Status: OK

BANK 1/DIMM1:

Größe: 8 GB

Typ: DDR3

Geschwindigkeit: 1867 MHz

Status: OK

このアンサーは役に立ちましたか?

スコア 2

コメント:

The way you have your RAM installed you have lost interleaf services. While it will work this way it is not the most efficient.

さんによる

コメントを追加

Correct! You want the SAME sized modules within the BANK.

Sadly, you have different sized modules within the BANK:

  • BANK0/DIMM0 has a 4GB
  • BANK0/DIMM1 has a 8GB

Where you want:

  • BANK0/DIMM0 will have a 4GB
  • BANK0/DIMM1 will have a 4GB

The other bank would be setup:

  • BANK1/DIMM0 will have a 8GB
  • BANK1/DIMM1 will have a 8GB

Or you could go the other way were Bank 0 has the larger modules.

Note: The number after the word BANK thats the bank number NOT the DIMM number.

このアンサーは役に立ちましたか?

スコア 1

コメント:

Thanks a lot. I was very unsettled. This morning I talked to apple and they told me this way is the right one (slot 1+3 each 4GB, slot 2+4 each 8GB)

さんによる

On my 2014 iMac retina 27 Apple told me to couple the modules by dimm. I tried the other way but I had a lot of issues!

さんによる

I found it really easy to upgrade the RAM on my iMac.

First, you can assume the factory installed ram is installed correctly so if you are not intending to swap those then do not remove them. They should both be in DIMM 0.

If you are filling two empty slots on a 4 slot iMac, just shove in a new matching pair and reboot. It should show the original pair occupying DIMM 0 and the new pair occupying DIMM 1 which is how you want it. You can disregard what banks they are in.

If you also want to replace the original memory, then remove the original SO-DIMMS and replace them with a matching pair. So, if you are looking at the 4 slots you have a top row and a bottom row (regardless whether your imac is lying face-up or face-down). You need to have a matching pair in the top slots and/or a matching pair in the bottom slots. You do not need to match a top slot with a bottom slot.

さんによる

コメントを追加

I tried the same size = same DIMM configuration (as above comments suggested it would be quicker) and my machine wouldn’t boot. Turns on but screen stays blank. Had to revert to installing by BANK. Any suggestions as to why?

iMac 27’ retina late 2015

2x stock 4GB DDR3 1867Mhz

2x OWC 16GB DDR3 1867Mhz

このアンサーは役に立ちましたか?

スコア 0

コメント:

Did you tried to inverse the DIMM ? I have already experienced solving the problem by inversing the DIMM.

For example if you have :

DIMM 0 - 4GB

DIMM 1 - 16GB

Then try

DIMM 0 - 16GB

DIMM 1 - 4GB

or vice-versa.

さんによる

Ha! Well I thought I had but obviously not. Just tried it again and it’s worked this time. Thank you! :)

さんによる

Memory bandwidth at previous config was 12.2 single core and 11.8 multi core. It’s now up at 22.6 single and 22.4 multi. So a significant improvement.

さんによる

I have the 2020 27" iMac with two 4 GB RAM (2667MHz) from Apple installed in slots 1 (Channel A/DiMM1) and 3 (Channel B DiMM1). When I followed the instructions, and installed two OWC 16GB RAM chips (2667MHz) in the free slots (2 and 4), it told me that my Mac had 4 memory slots each of which accepts a 2133 MHz DDR4 memory module - which is clearly incorrect! When I installed the 2 x 4GB Apple memory in slots 1 & 2 and the 2 x 16GB OWC in memory slots 3 & 4 it (correctly) told me that my Mac had 4 memory slots each of which accepts a 2667 MHz DDR4 memory module. So now I am completely non-plussed! I dint use Geekbench or anything but if the Mac thinks it has 2133 MHz memory modules, surely this is a bad thing????

さんによる

@peter: cleverest answer ever. Had the same problem: 2x4 stock in 2&4, 2667 mhz (of course, from factory). Adding identical dimm’s from a 2019 27” in 1&3, got 2133 mhz slowdown. Placed stock in 1&2 and remaining in 3&4 solved the problem. My final opinion is: why Apple’s KB about ram installation in (at least) the 27” is not clear???

さんによる

コメントを追加

回答を追加する

nobilif さん、ありがとうございました!
統計データを表示:

過去 24時間: 17

過去 7 日: 83

過去 30 日: 439

今までの合計 50,351