Every year, electronics manufacturers gather at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas to announce their new upcoming gizmos—and for the third time, iFixit has teamed up with our advocacy friends to call out some of the most troubling trends at the show. The third annual Worst In Show awards were held Friday, to shine a spotlight on the least repairable, least secure, and least sustainable products showcased at CES 2023.
While many of these wacky products never get off the ground, enough take flight that it’s worth calling out the less savory offerings.There are potentially serious consequences to the mass adoption of our top picks. Much like Sin City itself, the pretty exteriors of these products hide some pretty pernicious quirks.
This year’s judges included experts from the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Consumer Reports, SecuRepairs, JerryRigEverything, Public Interest Research Group, Repair.org, and (of course) iFixit.
When considering the next electronics disaster we ask ourselves:
- How useless is this product?
- Are the problems with this gadget a new innovation in awfulness?
- What is the global impact if the technology is widely adopted?
- How much worse is it than previous iterations of similar technology?
- How much do the negatives outweigh any positives?
The 2023 CES Wall of Shame
A Toilet Seat that Could Get You Arrested
Privacy Award – Withings U-Scan
First up, Cindy Cohn of the Electronic Frontier Foundation selects the Withings U-Scan, a toilet add-on that promises to analyze your pee. There’s a lot of potential data in your pee, enabling early detection of diseases and menstrual cycle tracking.
But as Cohn points out, pregnancy data needs to be treated with extra privacy care in the United States.
Peak Subscription with a Side of Hacking
Security – Roku Smart TV
Cybersecurity expert Paul Roberts of SecuRepairs picks the new Roku Smart TV. Roku has previously made smart TV software that runs on other manufacturers’ hardware, but now they’re getting into the hardware game themselves. Considering Roku’s past documented and exploited vulnerabilities, Paul is not excited about their entry into the hardware space.
A Consumer Reports analysis found that devices running the Roku TV platform had glaring security flaws. According to engineer Eason Goodale, “Roku devices have a totally unsecured remote control API enabled by default…It’s less of a locked door and more of a see-through curtain next to a neon ‘We’re open!’ sign.”
Paul notes that Roku has not published anything whatsoever about steps taken to mitigate the serious flaws in past iterations of software. The new line of TVs is being sold with a hands-free voice controlled remote, which means it’s always listening—all the problems of Alexa, without any history of solving security problems that arise.
If Only TVs Made More E-Waste
Environmental Impact – Displace Window TV
Shanika Whitehurst of Consumer Reports picks the Displace Window TV, a wireless TV that can be stuck onto any smooth surface like a wall or window. The catch? It runs on four giant lithium-ion batteries. As she rightly points out, those batteries still need to be plugged into a wall outlet to recharge.
Sure, it might look cool to have a wire-free TV on your window. But it won’t look so cool when those batteries empty and your TV falls off the window.
And it definitely won’t seem as cool when the cost of giant lithium-ion batteries skyrockets with lithium shortages starting in 2025, or when you have to go add your giant TV batteries to the 80 metric kilotons of batteries the US is expected to send to e-waste in 2030.
A Mug that Only Lasts as Long as Its Battery
Repairability – Ember 2+ Mug
iFixit’s Kyle Wiens picks the latest iteration of the Ember Mug, the Ember 2+. This is a thermos mug that will set you back a couple of benji’s so you can…keep your drink warm? In the latest iteration, they’ve added a potentially dubious tracking capability to help find your expensive mug if you lose it.
But don’t count on this mug lasting you more than a couple of years, because it’s got an embedded clump of lithium-ion pouch cell batteries and no plan for replacing them. After 300 or so uses, that battery will lose its mojo—if it doesn’t get too spicy before then.
Repairable products consider the eventual need to replace batteries, and they’re built to make that easy. Your favorite battery-free vacuum flask can keep your tea hot all day without unnecessary lithium-ion in an unrepairable design.
Take an Unrecyclable Tragedy, Add Unnecessary Screens
Community Choice – JBL Wireless Headphones
Zack Nelson, host of our favorite durability testing YouTube channel JerryRigEverything, picks the JBL wireless headphones.
We couldn’t agree more. Taking a highly problematic product with unrepairable embedded lithium batteries and slapping on a mini-LCD that poses further repairability problems is clearly not the bomb product we’re looking for. This literally adds nothing that our phones don’t already do—and smartphone pairing is by far the most prevalent use case for wireless earbuds. No one’s using these things on their first gen iPod and wishing they could access a touch display.
“Who Asked For This?” – Neutrogena SkinStacks
“We need to hold terrible ideas accountable” says Nathan Proctor, National Right to Repair Campaign Director at the Public Interest Research Group. His pick, the Neutrogena 3D vitamin gummy printer, is a true head scratcher.
Why indeed. For once, the US isn’t paving the way for mass market adoption of this particularly poorly thought-out idea. The UK is steamrolling along with what I might describe as a primer on how badly a company can prey on people’s fears and anxieties.
Overall Worst In Show – Withings U-Scan
Gay Gordon-Byrne, Director of Repair.org says, “There were some really good candidates…and for me, I really think the worst in show is actually that Withings pee reading toilet.”
As Gay notes, this is a service that we would get when we visit our doctors anyway, so for the general population, it’s not going to be particularly useful. And yet, we have a device that, if it ever reaches mass adoption, poses serious privacy risks not only in the ether but also within the home. The device is able to differentiate between the urine of different subjects. Aside from the potential to invade the privacy of those you share a roof with, what happens when one of these devices collects data from a visiting guest?
Where to from Here?
While we continue to see genuinely useful innovation in the world (OneThird deserves a shout-out: go check out their method to reduce food waste in the supply chain), the majority of what we see coming out of the Consumer Electronics Show continues to ride on the increasingly dire habit of endless consumption.
CES’s theme this year may have been human security with an eye towards sustainability, but the showroom floor was nothing more than business as usual as far as I could tell. Which unfortunately means that we’ll be back next year with another Worst In Show.
Embedded batteries, is PROOF POSITIVE that many who speak so loudly about "Sustainability" are ONLY speaking about a sustainable Cash Flow.
It would be nice to gather enough thinking people in the Market Place to REFUSE to buy any such products, and to rather Trade with Companies with proper ideas about themselves and their customers, to send a glaring message back to these hypocritical Control Freaks, that We, the Consumer, control YOU by our $ and we WON'T tolerate the reverse. We don't need you, you Need Us. And, of course, this is the same message to be sending to all MFG. of every product on this page [same message needs sent to Big Software-i.e. Adobe, etc.-TOO, who have ALL gone into the "Dairy Business", cause software developing didn't make them rich enough].
Tech is out of hand, because enough "Sheeple" [They ARE "Milked"] keep buying it cause it's "cool". It seems all too conclusive however. . ."you just can't iFix STUPID".
HAM - 返信
Maybe Apple and other manufactures could out compete their rivals by adding the feature of easily replaceable batteries and other parts that normally wear out? Or maybe this is not in their economic interests, as if products are able to be used for longer they will sell less of them.
Jim - 返信