この翻訳は機械によって生成されたものであり、まだ人間による校正は行われていません。 日本語を話せますか? レビューはこちらから。
はじめに
iFixitは、多くの人々が答えを求めて訪れる場所となっています。そこで、「ゴールド大容量バッテリー」に関する検証結果を掲載することにしました。今回の検証では、Apple iPhone 5のバッテリーを使用しました。もともと交換作業で必要とされていたものであり、単なる検証のために無駄にすることはありません。
これらのバッテリーは、Ebay.comやAmazon.comをはじめとする様々なオンラインストアで販売されています。価格は通常のバッテリーより50%ほど高く設定されているのが一般的です。もしそれらのバッテリーが本当に大容量の電力を蓄えられるのであれば、この価格設定自体は悪いことではありません。
必要な工具と部品
-
-
-
iPhone 5用のゴールド大容量バッテリーと、標準的な通常バッテリーを並べて比較します
-
ゴールドバッテリーの重量を測定すると0.830オンスでした
-
標準バッテリーの重量は0.848オンスです
-
-
-
-
Gold Batteryのテスト結果です。
-
Standard Batteryのテスト結果の要約は以下の通りです。タイトル: EB Tester Software、モード: D-CC (定電流放電) 0.50A 2.90V、開始電圧: 4.189V、カットオフ電圧: 2.904V、容量: 1353mAh、エネルギー: 4987mWh、平均電圧: 3.69V、カットオフ電圧2.9Vに達するまでの合計時間: 2時間42分44秒
-
Gold Battery。タイトル: EB Tester Software、モード: D-CC (定電流放電) 0.50A 2.90V、開始電圧: 4.182V、カットオフ電圧: 2.904V、容量: 1376mAh、エネルギー: 4969mWh、平均電圧: 3.61V、カットオフ電圧2.9Vに達するまでの合計時間: 2時間45分33秒
-
-
今回の検証結果から、ゴールドバッテリーの容量はわずか1376mAhであることが明確に示されました。これは、バッテリー本体や販売サイトに記載されている容量よりも49%少ない値です。
検証の結果、ゴールド大容量バッテリーは謳い文句ほどの容量はないものの、標準バッテリーより劣るわけではないことが分かりました。したがって、標準的な容量の交換用バッテリーを、より高い価格で購入したいのであれば、購入しても問題はありません。
「購入者には注意が必要です!」
141 の人々がこのガイドを完成させました。
10件のガイドコメント
I would add a second warning, from my experience/forced education with iPhone batteries about five years ago. The situation may have changed. But at the time, I was seeking affordable batteries for refurbished phones. So I tried eBay. And tried, and tried. Exactly one supplier (iFixit moderators, am I permitted to name the supplier?) provided full capacity (that is, full standard capacity) batteries that were accurately described. Every other supplier I tried was selling batteries that were far below standard capacity—some of these were “gold” batteries and some were standard.
So at least at that time, it was far from safe to buy gold batteries even if all one wanted was a standard capacity battery. The reality seems to be (or seemed to be) that these are batteries taken from used phones and sold as new regardless of their age, storage conditions, or existing capacity. That was the norm, not the exception.
If you’re going to be buying a lot of batteries, find a supplier you trust. I hear iFixit is good….
By the way, thank you for publishing this, and for doing such a thorough and careful job. I learned this the hard way.
It’s perhaps worth pointing out that maximum capacity of a battery of a given chemistry (e.g. lithium ion) is limited by size—hence your careful measurements in step 2. A battery with 50% more maximum capacity (i.e. capacity before degradation by aging and use) is going to be 50% bigger. You obviously know this, but it’s worth pointing out to people like me whose high school physics teachers are rolling over in their graves (or just rolling their eyes, depending on your age) when their former students are taken in by these things.
There are some new chemistries for lithium batteries, I understand, and I understand that they do have somewhat higher capacities. But that’s not what these gold batteries are. I even took the gold labels off some of the ones I bought and found the original labels beneath…
Maybe the author, or someone else could do a follow-up post? It seems that “high-capacity” batteries have proliferated, despite proof of false advertising. I even purchased a “high-capacity” battery off Amazon to repair my iPhone 6S Plus. The new battery seems like it holds a charge extremely well. I don’t remember the exact specs, approx. a 3500 mAh “high-capacity” battery vs. factory Apple battery ~2750-2850 mAh. Granted, I purchased my replacement battery before stumbling across this article & I really wonder whether any of the manufacturer’s are ACTUALLY providing accurate mAh ratings, currently. Some manufacturer’s are much more accurate with their product descriptions, build quality & capacity ratings. I just thought it would be a very interesting, and a very telling follow-up article to show whether or not manufacturer’s have changed any of their advertising practices since this original article. I challenge anyone out there to make this happen, and share with us their results, thanks!
I don’t know the date this article was written, but there’s a fairly recent one done by a reputable website, the Cult of Mac, in Feb. 2020, where they did the same test with two high capacity batteries, and one of them lasted 26% longer. But they also found the other one barely lasted longer.
.
So it’s definitely NOT a myth, but it depends a lot on the manufacturer it seems… Which is pretty hard to know up front, unless you are pretty confident what you're buying.
.
Here’s their article: https://www.cultofmac.com/686299/replace...