16GB 1600mhz vs 16GB 1866mhz RAM for MacBook Pro 13" mid 2012
I ran Geek Bench to test on 2 types of RAM's on my 13" MacBook Pro 2.9 GHz i7 (mid 2012).
1 - Crucial 16GB Kit (8GBx2) DDR3L-1600 SODIMM
32bit test: 2913
- Single-Core Score: 2913
- Multi-Core Score: 6105
64 bit test:
- Single-Core Score: 3132
- Multi-Core Score: 6754
2 - Kingston HyperX Impact Black 8GB 1866MHz DDR3L Laptop RAM (Low Voltage - HX318LS11IB/8)
32bit test:
- Single-Core Score: 2715
- Multi-Core Score: 5814
64bit test:
- Single-Core Score: 2986
- Multi-Core Score: 6975
So I would like to know your opinion about RAM. Which is better for my MacBook Pro:
この質問は役に立ちましたか?
2 件のコメント
Just to be clear here your second set of tests with the Kingston HyperX Impact Black was also two 8 GB modules. Correct? (both tests was with 16 GB of RAM)
Dan さんによる
-------------------- Crucial Vs Kingston
32bit test:
Single-Core Score: 2913 ---- 2715 - Diff of 198
Multi-Core Score: 6105 ---- 5814 - Diff of 291
*** Crucial is faster, but by very little
64bit test:
Single-Core Score: 3132 ---- 2986 - Diff of 146 to Crucial
Multi-Core Score: 6754 ---- 6975 - Diff of 221 to Kingston
*** Equal in performance as each bets the other.
Dan さんによる