メインコンテンツにスキップ
ヘルプ

オリジナル投稿者: B 2 ,

テキスト:

Hi @ All! Thank you for your great research!

I´ve got a mbp 13 mid 2009 with that .... nvidia chipset and controller. For Testing i put in a lowend sandisk ssd 128 last summer (which controller inside is nowhere to find - sandisk´s own?). In yosemite it showed 1,5 GBit firstly, after enabling trim for Non-apple ssds since yosemite 10105 it got it´s correct 3,0 Gbit fine running. Now i think about a 240gb version.

In my opinion sandisk made that firmware fix only for the first "etreme" because they had exactly that bad SF2281 controller built in, see http://ssd.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Crucial-BX100-250GB-vs-SanDisk-Extreme-240GB/3145vs1328

diablote´s tests with ultraII and plus from sandisk seem to be the best solution for me - the have marvell controllers both!?

On crucial side, someone tested a MX 200?

http://ssd.userbenchmark.com/Compare/SanDisk-Ultra-II-240GB-vs-Crucial-MX200-250GB/2548vs3196

but exactly the 250 version is bad?

http://www.anandtech.com/show/9258/crucial-mx200-250gb-500gb-1tb-ssd-review/4

In conclusion i´m glad NOT to go for a samsung evo - like most experts on new hardware opting......;-)

I stay @ sandisk, hey just found that the ssd plus has exactly the same controller like the bx 100

sorry is in german....

http://geizhals.at/sandisk-plus-240gb-sdssda-240g-g25-a1218315.html?hloc=at&pg=2#productlist

ステータス:

open